MindSight Projects:

Stress at work

Is this an issue for you? 

It is for a large percentage of the population and costs the economy billions per year. 

MindSight has developed a brand new online assessment for Stress at Work based on Decisionality technology (www.decisionality.com)

The assessment offers both public and private services and offers different levels of application:

1. Individual assessment - take the assessment online to identify whether you are stressed and which areas of work are affecting you most.

2. Corporate assessment - apply the anonymous assessment to your workforce to identify their levels of stress and the areas of work that affect them most.

Or, alternatively you could:

  • Adopt an existing template for you use with your own application.
  • Access market intelligence to enhance your business

  • Create a new tool completely - with our help.

If this interests you, please contact us:

Email: dawn@dawnheather.com 

 

 

 
 

 

"Real Progress cannot be measured by money

 alone.  We must ensure that economic growth

 contributes to our quality of life, rather than

degrading it." 


Right Hon Tony Blair MP  

Foreword to A Better Quality of Life, the UK's first Sustainable Development Strategy (1999)

What does 'quality of life' mean to you?

Can you list the criteria that need to be addressed in order that your happiness and well-being are satisfied on a daily basis and in the long term?

This could prove to be quite a complex exercise - certainly- I, or we, cannot define your personal needs and desires for you, only you can do that!  

Most people have difficulty in making a categorical list - often our priorities change from moment to moment as life evolves and we are faced with different challenges - so what may suit us today, may not tomorrow, or next year.

The following is a quote from Daunt's definition of Quality of Life:


"The concept of independence is a self-defined one which varies from person to person.  Of such a good quality of life we were able to identify these components:

  • Autonomy: the freedom to choose a preferred way of life

  • Independence: the opportunity to make one's own practical decisions; encouragement not to be over dependent in everyday matters

  • integration; acceptance by society as a fellow citizen and member of the community, with full political as well as social rights; freedom from marginalisation

  • respect; recognition of the value of one's identity and role, and of one's contribution to the lives of others

  • ownership; the possibility to keep one's own personal possessions and retain control over one's finances

  • social involvement and communication; access to a range of useful and interesting occupation, of educational experiences and cultural, leisure and self-help activities; enouragement and support in undertaking these; availability of an accessible environment, including transport

  • privacy

  • tranquillity; freedom from noise and disruption; continuity of place and environment"  Daunt, 1992, page 175

Where Daunt has defined quality of life criteria for people with disabilities, we would now replace 'integration' with 'inclusion', but broadly these definitions still provide good guidance and apply to each of us. 

When one tries to interpret these guidelines, discrepancies in the practical implementation emerge, due to the subjective interpretation of the criteria.  The concept of independence varies from person to person, and autonomy and inclusion are dynamic, not static, processes.  We continuously act and react, evolving and developing, adapting or modifying our beliefs and our attitudes with experiential learning.  So then, what exactly does the Rt Hon Tony Blair mean when he talks about economic growth contributing to our quality of life, rather than degrading it?  What criteria is he using to measure these effects?

At present it is extremely problematical to illustrate the enhancement of a person's quality of life with anything other than observable measures.  For instance, with good housing, healthy diet, sufficient income to sustain a good standard of living, healthcare, access to amenities - and so on.  But what about the more subtle influences - feeling valued, being loved, or needed?  What about the differences between us - one man's meat being another's poison?  

I would like us to help clarify what each of us regards as criteria against which our quality of lives may be measured.  I cannot do this alone without it becoming too subjective.  Therefore, I am asking for collaboration to create as comprehensive a list as possible. 

If you would like to help in this process please visit the website - link coming soon - or email me at: 

Email: dawn@dawnheather.com

We are currently seeing the results of quality of life imbalances in the high levels of stress that are affecting the nation's health and economy

 

 

 

.

 
Copyright © 2004. All Rights Reserved

 

 

 

 

"Real Progress cannot be measured by money

 alone.  We must ensure that economic growth

 contributes to our quality of life, rather than

degrading it." 


Right Hon Tony Blair MP  

Foreword to A Better Quality of Life, the UK's first Sustainable Development Strategy (1999)

What does 'quality of life' mean to you?

Can you list the criteria that need to be addressed in order that your happiness and well-being are satisfied on a daily basis and in the long term?

This could prove to be quite a complex exercise - certainly- I, or we, cannot define your personal needs and desires for you, only you can do that!  

Most people have difficulty in making a categorical list - often our priorities change from moment to moment as life evolves and we are faced with different challenges - so what may suit us today, may not tomorrow, or next year.

The following is a quote from Daunt's definition of Quality of Life:


"The concept of independence is a self-defined one which varies from person to person.  Of such a good quality of life we were able to identify these components:

  • Autonomy: the freedom to choose a preferred way of life

  • Independence: the opportunity to make one's own practical decisions; encouragement not to be over dependent in everyday matters

  • integration; acceptance by society as a fellow citizen and member of the community, with full political as well as social rights; freedom from marginalisation

  • respect; recognition of the value of one's identity and role, and of one's contribution to the lives of others

  • ownership; the possibility to keep one's own personal possessions and retain control over one's finances

  • social involvement and communication; access to a range of useful and interesting occupation, of educational experiences and cultural, leisure and self-help activities; enouragement and support in undertaking these; availability of an accessible environment, including transport

  • privacy

  • tranquillity; freedom from noise and disruption; continuity of place and environment"  Daunt, 1992, page 175

Where Daunt has defined quality of life criteria for people with disabilities, we would now replace 'integration' with 'inclusion', but broadly these definitions still provide good guidance and apply to each of us. 

When one tries to interpret these guidelines, discrepancies in the practical implementation emerge, due to the subjective interpretation of the criteria.  The concept of independence varies from person to person, and autonomy and inclusion are dynamic, not static, processes.  We continuously act and react, evolving and developing, adapting or modifying our beliefs and our attitudes with experiential learning.  So then, what exactly does the Rt Hon Tony Blair mean when he talks about economic growth contributing to our quality of life, rather than degrading it?  What criteria is he using to measure these effects?

At present it is extremely problematical to illustrate the enhancement of a person's quality of life with anything other than observable measures.  For instance, with good housing, healthy diet, sufficient income to sustain a good standard of living, healthcare, access to amenities - and so on.  But what about the more subtle influences - feeling valued, being loved, or needed?  What about the differences between us - one man's meat being another's poison?  

I would like us to help clarify what each of us regards as criteria against which our quality of lives may be measured.  I cannot do this alone without it becoming too subjective.  Therefore, I am asking for collaboration to create as comprehensive a list as possible. 

If you would like to help in this process please visit the website - link coming soon - or email me at: 

Email: dawn@dawnheather.com

We are currently seeing the results of quality of life imbalances in the high levels of stress that are affecting the nation's health and economy

 

 

 

.

 
Copyright © 2004. All Rights Reserved